Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom · Kalle Valo <hidden> · 2016-01-14
Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2016-01-14
[PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2016-01-14
[PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2016-01-18
Re: [RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused · Kalle Valo <hidden> · 2016-01-19

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-01-14 21:46:05
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml, netdev

2016-01-14 · Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
2016-01-13 · [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

From: Kalle Valo <redacted>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:46:29 +0200

I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
wireless-drivers trees.

+1