On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
quoted
An empty default block is not allowed so add a ; as empty statement to
make gcc happy.
A dummy "break" is the usual solution though. I don't think GCC ever
complains if it sees it unreachable after a "return" -- in a sense it is
just as unreachable as this null instruction is.
I wasn't overly picky. Whatever gets the stuff to build correctly. I'm
doing one final round of test builds over all -stable branches before
dropping most of them like radioctive rocks. But more on that later.
Ralf