Re: [PATCH] sb1250-duart.c: SB1250 DUART serial support
From: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Date: 2007-07-12 19:16:23
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
From: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Date: 2007-07-12 19:16:23
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
On Thursday 12 July 2007 19:16:20 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
[snip]
quoted
WARNING: declaring multiple variables together should be avoided #372: FILE: drivers/serial/sb1250-duart.c:246: + unsigned int mctrl, status;Well, this is probably superfluous -- why would anyone prefer: int r0; int r1; int r2; int r3; int r4; to: int r0, r1, r2, r3, r4; unconditionally?
Imagine you're working on a piece of kernel code that has a lot of parallel churn. Conflicts on lines like "int a,b,c,d;" are more likely to cause Andrew et al pain, which I guess is the rationale for discouraging it. Conversely, if the variables are kept separate, diff handles it fine. I think as long as the variables are logically grouped, the pain is minimised, but there's a few good reasons for the verbose style. -- Cheers, Alistair. 137/1 Warrender Park Road, Edinburgh, UK.