Re: [PATCH] Make MIPS udelay() preempt safe
flat view
From: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Date: 2007-03-20 01:03:29
Nevermind on this one. I just noticed that the original patch is not needed. ~Deepak On Mar 19 2007, at 16:49, Deepak Saxena was caught saying:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fix MIPS udelay to make is preempt safe under DEBUG_PREEMPT Signed-off-by: Manish Lachwani <redacted> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <redacted> --- This needs to go into -rt patch set or directly into the MIPS tree. Applies cleanly to 2.6.21-rc4 and 2.6.21-rc3-rt0. include/asm-mips/delay.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-2.6.18/include/asm-mips/delay.h ===================================================================--- linux-2.6.18.orig/include/asm-mips/delay.h +++ linux-2.6.18/include/asm-mips/delay.h@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline void __udelay(unsigned lon __delay(usecs); } -#define __udelay_val cpu_data[smp_processor_id()].udelay_val +#define __udelay_val cpu_data[raw_smp_processor_id()].udelay_val #define udelay(usecs) __udelay((usecs),__udelay_val)-- Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@plexity.net - http://www.plexity.net In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask "why were their poets silent?" - Bertolt Brecht
-- Deepak Saxena - dsaxena@plexity.net - http://www.plexity.net In the end, they will not say, "those were dark times," they will ask "why were their poets silent?" - Bertolt Brecht