Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2003-08-04

RE: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp

From: Dominic Sweetman <hidden>
Date: 2003-08-01 07:53:46

If this is just to ensure the I Cache coherency for modified code
then the following should be sufficient:

cache Hit_Writeback_D, offset(base_register)
cache Hit_Invalidate_I, offset(base_register)

The ordering does matter however since the Hit_Invalidate_I makes
sure the write buffer is flushed.
I'm probably jumping into the middle of something, sorry... 

The MIPS32/MIPS64 release 2 architecture includes a useful instruction
SYNCI which does the whole job (repeat on each affected cache line)
and is legal in user mode; this will take a while to spread but I'd
recommend it as a model worth following.

So I hope that kernels will provide one function for "I've just
written instructions and now I want to execute them", and not export
the separate writeback-D/invalidate-I interface.

--
Dominic Sweetman
MIPS Technologies
dom@mips.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help