Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 1997-11-28
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: Bintuils · Ralf Baechle <hidden> · 1997-11-28
  • Re: Bintuils · Alan Cox <hidden> · 1997-11-28

Re: Bintuils

From: Ralf Baechle <hidden>
Date: 1997-11-28 13:58:32

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, Nov 28, 1997 at 01:35:14PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
	Has anyone attempted to build the binutils fixed RPM with the old
buggy binutils. Im trying this right now and Im getting
Im now off to rebuild it from scratch with the static new linker to see what
occurs
I just checked the binutils on my (Intel ...) laptop.  Libbfd contains
DT_NEEDED entries for libc.so.6.  This means that libbfd was linked
against libc which will make binutils 2.7 produce bad executables.

Suggested bootstrap procedure:

  - restore your old binutils 2.7 binaries
  - manually rebuild binutils 2.8.1 + patch.  When configuring binutils
    2.8.1 do not use the --enable-shared option, it will make binutils
    2.7 generate bad libraries.
  - install the binutils just built
  - You should now be able to rebuild the rpm without problems

  Ralf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help