Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for your review, I will fix it at next version.

On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 15:31 +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:

Hi Jianjun,

[...]

quoted

+static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
+	.name = "MSI",
+	.irq_enable = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_disable = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
+	.irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
+	.irq_mask = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
+};

For consistency sake, what about aligning this like the
struct mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip has been?  See immediately below.

[...]

quoted

+static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
+	.irq_ack		= mtk_msi_bottom_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask		= mtk_msi_bottom_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= mtk_msi_bottom_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= mtk_compose_msi_msg,
+	.irq_set_affinity	= mtk_pcie_set_affinity,
+	.name			= "MSI",
+};

Krzysztof

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek