Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your review, I will fix it at next version.
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 15:31 +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
Hi Jianjun,
[...]
quoted
+static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "MSI",
+ .irq_enable = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_disable = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
+ .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
+ .irq_mask = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
+};
For consistency sake, what about aligning this like the
struct mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip has been? See immediately below.
[...]
quoted
+static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
+ .irq_ack = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_ack,
+ .irq_mask = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg,
+ .irq_set_affinity = mtk_pcie_set_affinity,
+ .name = "MSI",
+};
Krzysztof
Thanks.