Re: [PATCHv2 8/8] videobuf2: handle non-contiguous DMA allocations
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Date: 2021-07-07 12:42:37
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:33 PM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:44:08PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:quoted
quoted
Well, dma_alloc_coherent users want a non-cached mapping. And while some architectures provide that using a vmap with "uncached" bits in the PTE to provide that, this: a) is not possibly everywhere b) even where possible is not always the best idea as it creates mappings with differnet cachability betsI think this could be addressed by having a dma_vmap() helper that does the right thing, whether it's vmap() or dma_common_pages_remap() as appropriate. Or would be this still insufficient for some architectures?It can't always do the right thing. E.g. for the case where uncached memory needs to be allocated from a special boot time fixed pool.
Fair enough. Thanks for elaborating.
quoted
quoted
And even without that dma_alloc_noncoherent causes less overhead than dma_alloc_noncontigious if you only need a single contiguous range.Given that behind the scenes dma_alloc_noncontiguous() would also just call __dma_alloc_pages() for devices that need contiguous pages, would the overhead be basically the creation of a single-entry sgtable?In the best case: yes.quoted
quoted
So while I'm happy we have something useful for more complex drivers like v4l I think the simple dma_alloc_coherent API, including some of the less crazy flags for dma_alloc_attrs is the right thing to use for more than 90% of the use cases.One thing to take into account here is that many drivers use the existing "simple" way, just because there wasn't a viable alternative to do something better. Agreed, though, that we shouldn't optimize for the rare cases.While that might be true for a few drivers, it is absolutely not true for the wide majority. I think you media people are a little special, with only the GPU folks contending for "specialness" :) (although media handles it way better, gpu folks just create local hacks that can't work portably).
I don't have the evidence to argue, so let's just leave it at "time will tell". I think it's great that we have the possibility to do the more special things and we can see where it goes from now on. :) Best regards, Tomasz