Re: [PATCHv2 8/8] videobuf2: handle non-contiguous DMA allocations
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Date: 2021-06-25 03:10:39
Also in:
lkml
Hi Hans, On (21/06/17 16:56), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: [..]
static void *vb2_dc_vaddr(struct vb2_buffer *vb, void *buf_priv)
{
struct vb2_dc_buf *buf = buf_priv;
if (buf->vaddr)
return buf->vaddr;
if (buf->db_attach) {
struct dma_buf_map map;
if (!dma_buf_vmap(buf->db_attach->dmabuf, &map))
buf->vaddr = map.vaddr;
return buf->vaddr;
}
if (!buf->coherent_mem)
buf->vaddr = dma_vmap_noncontiguous(buf->dev, buf->size,
buf->dma_sgt);
return buf->vaddr;
}
And in vb2_dc_alloc functions set vaddr for !DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
in both coherent and non-coherent. So that we probably can have less
branches when ->vaddr is NULL for one type of allocations, and is not
NULL for another.
static int vb2_dc_alloc_coherent(struct vb2_dc_buf *buf)
{
struct vb2_queue *q = buf->vb->vb2_queue;
buf->cookie = dma_alloc_attrs(buf->dev,
buf->size,
&buf->dma_addr,
GFP_KERNEL | q->gfp_flags,
buf->attrs);
if (!buf->cookie)
return -ENOMEM;
if (q->dma_attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING)
return 0;
buf->vaddr = buf->cookie;
return 0;
}
static int vb2_dc_alloc_non_coherent(struct vb2_dc_buf *buf)
{
struct vb2_queue *q = buf->vb->vb2_queue;
buf->dma_sgt = dma_alloc_noncontiguous(buf->dev,
buf->size,
buf->dma_dir,
GFP_KERNEL | q->gfp_flags,
buf->attrs);
if (!buf->dma_sgt)
return -ENOMEM;
if (q->dma_attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING)
return 0;
buf->vaddr = dma_vmap_noncontiguous(buf->dev, buf->size, buf->dma_sgt);
if (!buf->vaddr) {
dma_free_noncontiguous(buf->dev, buf->size,
buf->dma_sgt, buf->dma_addr);
return -ENOMEM;
}
return 0;
}I guess this should address the case when "after allocating the buffer, the buffer is exported as a dma_buf and another device calls dma_buf_ops vb2_dc_dmabuf_ops_vmap, which in turn calls dma_buf_map_set_vaddr(map, buf->vaddr); with a NULL buf->vaddr" Because ->vaddr will not be NULL now after allocation for both coherent and non-coherent buffers (modulo DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING requests). What do you think?