On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:10:05 +0100,
Mimi Zohar wrote:

Hi Takashi,

On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 17:11 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:

quoted

Currently arch_ima_get_secureboot() and arch_get_ima_policy() are
defined only when CONFIG_IMA is set, and this makes the code calling
those functions without CONFIG_IMA failing.  Although there is no such
in-tree users, but the out-of-tree users already hit it.

Move the declaration and the dummy definition of those functions
outside ifdef-CONFIG_IMA block for fixing the undefined symbols.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <redacted>

Joey's patch has a dependency on your patch, as seen by the kernel test
robot report.  I'll drop the one line referencing in-tree/out-of-tree
sentence in the patch description, before picking it up as well.

Sure, feel free to cook it :)


thanks,

Takashi