Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-22

Re: [PATCH] ima: Fix undefined arch_ima_get_secureboot() and co

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-12-14 15:31:36
Also in: lkml

Hi Takashi,

On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 17:11 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Currently arch_ima_get_secureboot() and arch_get_ima_policy() are
defined only when CONFIG_IMA is set, and this makes the code calling
those functions without CONFIG_IMA failing.  Although there is no such
in-tree users, but the out-of-tree users already hit it.

Move the declaration and the dummy definition of those functions
outside ifdef-CONFIG_IMA block for fixing the undefined symbols.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <redacted>
Before lockdown was upstreamed, we made sure that IMA and lockdown
could co-exist.  This patch makes the stub functions available even
when IMA is not configured.  Do the remaining downstream patches
require IMA to be disabled or can IMA co-exist?

thanks,

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help