Re: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules
flat view
From: liqiong <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 06:42:21
Also in:
linux-security-module, lkml
Subsystem:
extended verification module (evm), integrity measurement architecture (ima), security subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Mimi Zohar, Roberto Sassu, Dmitry Kasatkin, Paul Moore, James Morris, "Serge E. Hallyn", Linus Torvalds
Hi Simon, Thanks for you help, i may got it, here is the new commit message: The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules" that default to "&ima_default_rules". When loading a custom policy for the first time, the variable is updated to "&ima_policy_rules" instead. That update isn't RCU-safe, and deadlocks are possible. Because some functions like ima_match_policy() may loop indefinitely over traversing the "ima_default_rules" as list_for_each_entry_rcu(). When iterating over the default ruleset back to head, value of "&entry->list" is "&ima_default_rules", and "ima_rules" may have been updated to "&ima_policy_rules", the loop condition (&entry->list != ima_rules) stay alway true, traversing doesn't terminate, cause soft lockup and RCU stalls. Introduce a temporary value for "ima_rules" when iterating over the ruleset to avoid the deadlocks. Signed-off-by: liqiong <redacted> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index fd5d46e511f1..e92b197bfd3c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
Thanks liqiong 在 2021年08月26日 17:01, THOBY Simon 写道:
Hi liqiong, On 8/26/21 10:15 AM, liqiong wrote:quoted
Hi Simon, Thanks for your help, your advice is clear, can i just use it, how about this: The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules", and the pointer starts pointing at the list "ima_default_rules".After reading it again, maybe "The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules", that defaults to "&ima_default_rules".'?quoted
When loading a custom policy for the first time, the variable is updated to point to the list "ima_policy_rules" instead. That update isn't RCU-safe, and deadlocks are possible.I think what Mimi was trying to say is that you could add the high-level overview above, but keep the details. Sorry if I wasn't clearer in my earlier messages. Consider re-adding your previous paragraph """ As a consequence, when traversing the ruleset, some functions like ima_match_policy() may loop indefinitely over "ima_default_rules" as list_for_each_entry_rcu() doesn't terminate (after the update, "ima_rules" no longer points to the list head, so the loop condition stays always true), causing RCU stalls. """ (note: I tweaked it above, feel free to fix it)quoted
Introduce a temporary value for "ima_rules" when iterating over the ruleset to avoid the deadlocks.... while keeping this a separate paragraph.quoted
Signed-off-by: liqiong <redacted> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index fd5d46e511f1..e92b197bfd3c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.cThanks liqiong