Re: [PATCH] ima: fix deadlock within RCU list of ima_rules
From: THOBY Simon <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-26 09:01:12
Also in:
linux-security-module, lkml
Hi liqiong, On 8/26/21 10:15 AM, liqiong wrote:
Hi Simon, Thanks for your help, your advice is clear, can i just use it, how about this: The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules", and the pointer starts pointing at the list "ima_default_rules".
After reading it again, maybe "The current IMA ruleset is identified by the variable "ima_rules", that defaults to "&ima_default_rules".'?
When loading a custom policy for the first time, the variable is updated to point to the list "ima_policy_rules" instead. That update isn't RCU-safe, and deadlocks are possible.
I think what Mimi was trying to say is that you could add the high-level overview above, but keep the details. Sorry if I wasn't clearer in my earlier messages. Consider re-adding your previous paragraph """ As a consequence, when traversing the ruleset, some functions like ima_match_policy() may loop indefinitely over "ima_default_rules" as list_for_each_entry_rcu() doesn't terminate (after the update, "ima_rules" no longer points to the list head, so the loop condition stays always true), causing RCU stalls. """ (note: I tweaked it above, feel free to fix it)
Introduce a temporary value for "ima_rules" when iterating over the ruleset to avoid the deadlocks.
... while keeping this a separate paragraph.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: liqiong <redacted> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index fd5d46e511f1..e92b197bfd3c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.cThanks liqiong