Re: [PATCH 010/141] ima: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-20 20:53:57
Also in:
linux-hardening, linux-security-module, lkml
Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/20/20 12:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 2d1af8899cab..600b97677085 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c@@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id, bool contents) pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n"); return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */ } + break; default: break; }diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 9b5adeaa47fc..ea634fc3b82f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c@@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, rule->lsm[i].rule); + break; default: break; }@@ -802,6 +803,7 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) add_rules(default_measurement_rules, ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules), IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + break; default: break; }