On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 05:59:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
...
quoted
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "maxim,constant-current-disable", &outconf);
+ if (ret && (ret != -EINVAL))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
Why shadowing the real error code?
quoted
+ "Failed to read maxim,constant-current-disable OF property\n");
It may be not only OF :-)
Btw, can you compare this approach and the below in terms of bloat-o-meter
against the object file size?
// can be done without this as well, just the same string as a parameter
const char *propname;
propname = "maxim,constant-current-disable";
ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, propname, &outconf);
if (ret && (ret != -EINVAL))
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read %s device property\n", propname);
While the above is strong hint to the compiler, the below should give similar
result but by the duplicates elimination:
ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "maxim,constant-current-disable", &outconf);
if (ret && (ret != -EINVAL))
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read %s device property\n",
"maxim,constant-current-disable");
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko