The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c
index f91d0e02ddae..d71690ce6463 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int da9052_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return error;
}
-static int da9052_ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void da9052_ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct da9052_tsi *tsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -322,13 +322,11 @@ static int da9052_ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
input_unregister_device(tsi->dev);
kfree(tsi);
-
- return 0;
}
static struct platform_driver da9052_tsi_driver = {
.probe = da9052_ts_probe,
- .remove = da9052_ts_remove,
+ .remove_new = da9052_ts_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "da9052-tsi",
},--
2.40.1