Re: [RESEND 00/25] Rid W=1 warnings from HID
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-07 16:10:20
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-iio, linux-media, linux-usb, lkml
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:56 AM Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. Lee Jones (25): HID: intel-ish-hid: Remove unused variable 'err' HID: ishtp-hid-client: Move variable to where it's actually used HID: intel-ish-hid: pci-ish: Remove unused variable 'ret' HID: intel-ish: Supply some missing param descriptions HID: intel-ish: Fix a naming disparity and a formatting error HID: usbhid: Repair a formatting issue in a struct description HID: intel-ish-hid: Fix a little doc-rot HID: usbhid: hid-pidff: Demote a couple kernel-doc abuses HID: hid-alps: Correct struct misnaming HID: intel-ish-hid: Fix potential copy/paste error HID: hid-core: Fix incorrect function name in header HID: intel-ish-hid: ipc: Correct fw_reset_work_fn() function name in header HID: ishtp-hid-client: Fix incorrect function name report_bad_packet() HID: hid-kye: Fix incorrect function name for kye_tablet_enable() HID: hid-picolcd_core: Remove unused variable 'ret' HID: hid-logitech-hidpp: Fix conformant kernel-doc header and demote abuses HID: hid-uclogic-rdesc: Kernel-doc is for functions and structs HID: hid-thrustmaster: Demote a bunch of kernel-doc abuses HID: hid-uclogic-params: Ensure function names are present and correct in kernel-doc headers HID: hid-sensor-custom: Remove unused variable 'ret' HID: wacom_sys: Demote kernel-doc abuse HID: hid-sensor-hub: Remove unused struct member 'quirks' HID: hid-sensor-hub: Move 'hsdev' description to correct struct definition HID: intel-ish-hid: ishtp-fw-loader: Fix a bunch of formatting issues HID: ishtp-hid-client: Fix 'suggest-attribute=format' compiler warningThese have been on the list for a couple of weeks now. Is there anything I can do to help expedite their merge? I'm concerned since -rc6 has just been released.
Sorry for the delay. I am currently queuing them locally and running a few tests on them. I don't expect anything to happen, but better be safe than anything. FWIW, I am splitting the series in 3: - 11 patches for intel ish are going to be queued in for-5.13/intel-ish - the thrustmaster one in for-5.13/thrustmaster - the rest (13 patches) will be sent in for-5.13/warnings. Cheers, Benjamin