Re: [PATCH 3/3] input: gpio-keys: Use hrtimer for software debounce
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Date: 2021-03-05 20:01:38
Also in:
lkml
Hi Dmitry, Le ven. 5 mars 2021 à 10:35, Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] a écrit :
Hi Paul, On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:01:11PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:quoted
-static void gpio_keys_gpio_work_func(struct work_struct *work) +static enum hrtimer_restart gpio_keys_debounce_timer(struct hrtimer *t) { - struct gpio_button_data *bdata = - container_of(work, struct gpio_button_data, work.work); + struct gpio_button_data *bdata = container_of(t, + struct gpio_button_data, + debounce_timer); gpio_keys_gpio_report_event(bdata);I am not sure how this works. As far as I know, even HRTIMER_MODE_REL_SOFT do not allow sleeping in the timer handlers, and gpio_keys_gpio_report_event() use sleeping variant of GPIOD API (and that is not going to change).
Quoting <linux/hrtimers.h>, the "timer callback will be executed in soft irq context", so sleeping should be possible. But I guess in this case I can use HRTIMER_MODE_REL.
It seems to me that if you want to use software debounce in gpio keys driver you need to set up sufficiently high HZ for your system. Maybe we could thrown a warning when we see low debounce delay and low HZ to alert system developer.
This is exactly what we should not do. I certainly don't want to have 250+ timer interrupts per second just so that input events aren't lost, to work around a sucky debounce implementation. Besides, if you consider the hrtimers doc (Documentation/timers/hrtimers.rst), hrtimers really are what should be used here. -Paul