Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 11 authors, 2021-02-06

Re: [PATCH] mailbox: arm_mhuv2: make remove callback return void

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-02-03 02:59:13
Also in: alsa-devel, dmaengine, dri-devel, kvm, linux-crypto, linux-fbdev, linux-i2c, linux-mmc, linux-rtc, linux-serial, linux-spi, linux-watchdog, lkml

On 02-02-21, 20:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
My build tests failed to catch that amba driver that would have needed
adaption in commit 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return
void"). Change the remove function to make the driver build again.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Fixes: 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
---
Hello,

I guess I missed that driver during rebase as it was only introduced in
the last merge window. Sorry for that.

I'm unsure what is the right thing to do now. Should I redo the pull
request (with this patch squashed into 3fd269e74f2f)? Or do we just
apply this patch on top?

FTR, the test robot report is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/202102030343.D9j1wukx-lkp@intel.com (local)

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
index 67fb10885bb4..6cf1991a5c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
@@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static int mhuv2_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
+static void mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
 {
 	struct mhuv2 *mhu = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
 
 	if (mhu->frame == SENDER_FRAME)
 		writel_relaxed(0x0, &mhu->send->access_request);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static struct amba_id mhuv2_ids[] = {
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help