Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 11 authors, 2021-02-06

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] amba: minor fix and various cleanups

From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-02-02 10:51:54
Also in: alsa-devel, dmaengine, dri-devel, kvm, linux-crypto, linux-fbdev, linux-i2c, linux-mmc, linux-rtc, linux-serial, linux-spi, linux-watchdog, lkml

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 05:58:30PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig.org@pengutronix.de

Hello,

Changes since v2 sent with Message-Id:
20201124133139.3072124-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org:

 - Rebase to v5.11-rc1 (which resulted in a few conflicts in
   drivers/hwtracing).
 - Add various Acks.
 - Send to more maintainers directly (which I think is one of the
   reasons why there are so few Acks).

For my taste patch 4 needs some more acks (drivers/char/hw_random,
drivers/dma, drivers/gpu/drm/pl111, drivers/i2c, drivers/mmc,
drivers/vfio, drivers/watchdog and sound/arm have no maintainer feedback
yet).

My suggestion is to let this series go in via Russell King (who cares
for amba). Once enough Acks are there I can also provide a tag for
merging into different trees. Just tell me if you prefer this solution.

Would be great if this could make it for v5.12, but I'm aware it's
already late in the v5.11 cycle so it might have to wait for v5.13.
I think you need to have a 6th patch which moves the
probe/remove/shutdown methods into the bus_type - if you're setting
them for every struct device_driver, then there's no point doing that
and they may as well be in the bus_type.

Apart from that, it looks good.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help