Re: [PATCH v16 3/3] Input: new da7280 haptic driver
From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-07-22 15:23:51
Also in:
linux-pwm, lkml
On 7/9/20 3:27 AM, Roy Im wrote:
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support. It communicates via an I2C bus to the device. Signed-off-by: Roy Im <redacted> --- v16: - Corrected some code and updated description in Kconfig. v15: - Removed some defines and updated some comments. v14: - Updated pwm related code, alignments and comments. v13: - Updated some conditions in pwm function and alignments. v12: No changes. v11: - Updated the pwm related code, comments and typo. v10: - Updated the pwm related function and added some comments. v9: - Removed the header file and put the definitions into the c file. - Updated the pwm code and error logs with %pE v8: - Added changes to support FF_PERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM and FF_CONSTANT. - Updated the dt-related code. - Removed memless related functions. v7: - Added more attributes to handle one value per file. - Replaced and updated the dt-related code and functions called. - Fixed error/functions. v6: No changes. v5: Fixed errors in Kconfig file. v4: Updated code as dt-bindings are changed. v3: No changes. v2: Fixed kbuild error/warning drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/input/misc/da7280.c | 1840 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 1854 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/input/misc/da7280.c
Hi Roy, Overall the driver looks pretty good now. I did find one issue, see below. If you fix that I am happy to add a Reviewed-by line. Reviewed-By: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c8c42ac --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/input/misc/da7280.c
[snip]
+static int da7280_haptic_set_pwm(struct da7280_haptic *haptics, bool enabled)
+{
+ struct pwm_state state;
+ u64 period_mag_multi;
+ int error;
+
+ if (!haptics->gain && enabled) {
+ dev_err(haptics->dev,
+ "Please set the gain first for the pwm mode\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ pwm_get_state(haptics->pwm_dev, &state);
+ state.enabled = enabled;
+ if (enabled) {
+ period_mag_multi = state.period * haptics->gain;
You are multiplying an unsigned int to a u16 and storing it in a u64.
However, C doesn't promote the types, so you'll end up with an
unexpected result here. You can fix it by promoting state.period to u64, ie:
period_mage_multi = (u64)state.period * haptics->gain;
See the following example code which demonstrates the problem.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
uint64_t foo(unsigned int a, uint16_t b)
{
uint64_t tmp = a * b;
return tmp;
}
uint64_t bar(unsigned int a, uint16_t b)
{
uint64_t tmp = (uint64_t)a * b;
return tmp;
}
int main()
{
uint64_t val;
unsigned int a = 0xff00ff00;
uint16_t b = 0x200;
val = foo(a, b);
printf("result(%0x, %0x) = %0llx\n", a, b, val);
val = bar(a, b);
printf("result(%0x, %0x) = %0llx\n", a, b, val);
}
Cheers,
Jes