On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:51:47AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:

Hi Shawn,

quoted

Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU
case

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:40:18PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:

quoted

quoted

Subject: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU
case

I have one patch pending reviewing.
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc

hwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F11395247%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.f
an%40n

quoted

xp.com%7C995815002e2b490791e008d7c9445133%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa9
2cd99c5c

quoted

301635%7C0%7C0%7C637199167574579419&sdata=RM4Mtwl8LZ3ft9
3uL3FQPcHT

quoted

9lPHSqBOgugozkcLvag%3D&reserved=0

I dropped that patch from my queue and picked patch #2 from this series as
the favor.

I think dropping that patch might cause Linux-next build fail as previously showed,
because IMX_SCU_SOC depends on COMPILE_TEST. If you drop that patch,
also need to drop COMPILE_TEST from IMX_SCU_SOC.

 ld: drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx-scu.o: in function `.imx_scu_soc_probe':
 soc-imx-scu.c:(.text.imx_scu_soc_probe+0x44): undefined reference to 
`.imx_scu_get_handle'
 ld: soc-imx-scu.c:(.text.imx_scu_soc_probe+0x134): undefined reference 
 to `.imx_scu_call_rpc'
 ld: soc-imx-scu.c:(.text.imx_scu_soc_probe+0x20c): undefined reference 
 to `.imx_scu_call_rpc'
 
 Caused by commit
 
   68c189e3a93c ("soc: imx: increase build coverage for imx8m soc 
 driver")

What do you prefer? I personally think dummy functions would be good.

I would rather drop COMPILE_TEST from IMX_SCU_SOC.  Could you send a
patch for that shortly?

Shawn