Hi Ksenija!

Ksenija Stanojevic writes:

+static int mxs_lradc_ts_register(struct mxs_lradc_ts *ts)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input = ts->ts_input;
+	struct device *dev = ts->dev;
+
+	input = devm_input_allocate_device(dev);
+	if (!input)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	input->name = "mxs-lradc-ts";
+	input->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
+	input->open = mxs_lradc_ts_open;
+	input->close = mxs_lradc_ts_close;
+
+	__set_bit(EV_ABS, input->evbit);
+	__set_bit(EV_KEY, input->evbit);
+	__set_bit(BTN_TOUCH, input->keybit);
+	__set_bit(INPUT_PROP_DIRECT, input->propbit);
+	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_X, 0, LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK, 0, 0);
+	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_Y, 0, LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK, 0, 0);
+	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_PRESSURE, 0, LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK,
+			     0, 0);
+
+	ts->ts_input = input;
+	input_set_drvdata(input, ts);
+
+	return input_register_device(input);
+}
+
+static int mxs_lradc_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
+	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	struct mxs_lradc_ts *ts;
+	struct resource *iores;
+	int ret, irq, virq, i;
+	u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;
+
+	ts = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ts), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ts)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ts);
+
+	ts->lradc = lradc;
+	ts->dev = dev;
+	spin_lock_init(&ts->lock);
+
+	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	ts->base = devm_ioremap(dev, iores->start, resource_size(iores));
+	if (IS_ERR(ts->base))
+		return PTR_ERR(ts->base);
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
+				   &ts_wires);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,ave-ctrl", &adapt)) {
+		ts->over_sample_cnt = 4;
+	} else {
+		if (adapt >= 1 || adapt <= 32) {
+			ts->over_sample_cnt = adapt;
+		} else {
+			dev_err(ts->dev, "Invalid sample count (%u)\n",
+				adapt);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,ave-delay", &adapt)) {
+		ts->over_sample_delay = 2;
+	} else {
+		if (adapt >= 2 || adapt <= LRADC_DELAY_DELAY_MASK + 1) {
+			ts->over_sample_delay = adapt;
+		} else {
+			dev_err(ts->dev, "Invalid sample delay (%u)\n",
+				adapt);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,settling", &adapt)) {
+		ts->settling_delay = 10;
+	} else {
+		if (adapt >= 1 || adapt <= LRADC_DELAY_DELAY_MASK) {
+			ts->settling_delay = adapt;
+		} else {
+			dev_err(ts->dev, "Invalid settling delay (%u)\n",
+				adapt);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = stmp_reset_block(ts->base);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	mxs_lradc_ts_hw_init(ts);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, mxs_lradc_ts_irq_names[i]);
+		if (irq < 0)
+			return irq;
+
+		virq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, irq);
+
+		mxs_lradc_ts_stop(ts);
+
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, virq,
+				       mxs_lradc_ts_handle_irq,
+				       0, mxs_lradc_ts_irq_names[i], ts);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	mxs_lradc_ts_register(ts);
+
+	return 0;

In case you end up creating v15, please check if the above can be:
return mxs_lradc_ts_register(ts);

Offtopic: This patch series has got the most contradictory review
comments I have seen so far at kernel work. Thanks for your tireless
effort to satisfy everybody. I'm looking forward to this getting merged.

Harald

-- 
If you want to support my work:
see http://friends.ccbib.org/harald/supporting/
or donate via CLAM to xASPBtezLNqj4cUe8MT5nZjthRSEjrRQXN
or via peercoin to P98LRdhit3gZbHDBe7ta5jtXrMJUms4p7w