[PATCH v2 01/15] HID: logitech-dj: allow devices to request full pairing information
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-02 14:12:58
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
hid core layer, hid logitech drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires, Linus Torvalds
Register 0xB5 should be handled specially no matter what function is used. This allows to retrieve the serial and the Quad ID from hid-logitech-hidpp directly. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <redacted> --- no changes in v2 --- drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
index 5bc6d80..71ce4ca 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c@@ -692,8 +692,12 @@ static void logi_dj_ll_close(struct hid_device *hid) dbg_hid("%s:%s\n", __func__, hid->phys); } -static u8 unifying_name_query[] = {0x10, 0xff, 0x83, 0xb5, 0x40, 0x00, 0x00}; -static u8 unifying_name_answer[] = {0x11, 0xff, 0x83, 0xb5}; +/* + * Register 0xB5 is "pairing information". It is solely intended for the + * receiver, so do not overwrite the device index. + */ +static u8 unifying_pairing_query[] = {0x10, 0xff, 0x83, 0xb5}; +static u8 unifying_pairing_answer[] = {0x11, 0xff, 0x83, 0xb5}; static int logi_dj_ll_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned char reportnum, __u8 *buf,
@@ -712,8 +716,8 @@ static int logi_dj_ll_raw_request(struct hid_device *hid, /* special case where we should not overwrite * the device_index */ - if (count == 7 && !memcmp(buf, unifying_name_query, - sizeof(unifying_name_query))) + if (count == 7 && !memcmp(buf, unifying_pairing_query, + sizeof(unifying_pairing_query))) buf[4] |= djdev->device_index - 1; else buf[1] = djdev->device_index;
@@ -911,9 +915,8 @@ static int logi_dj_hidpp_event(struct hid_device *hdev, /* special case were the device wants to know its unifying * name */ if (size == HIDPP_REPORT_LONG_LENGTH && - !memcmp(data, unifying_name_answer, - sizeof(unifying_name_answer)) && - ((data[4] & 0xF0) == 0x40)) + !memcmp(data, unifying_pairing_answer, + sizeof(unifying_pairing_answer))) device_index = (data[4] & 0x0F) + 1; else return false;
--
2.9.3