On Nov 25 2016 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:03 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
quoted
One more device requiring a quirk :/
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <redacted>
Tested-by: Bastien Nocera <redacted>
quoted
---
drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-
hub.c
index 50aad26..f9440b6 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
@@ -798,6 +798,9 @@ static const struct hid_device_id
sensor_hub_devices[] = {
{ HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB,
USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT,
USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_2),
.driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK},
+ { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB,
USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT,
+ 0x07bd), /* Microsoft Surface 3 TypeCover */
The sensor is not in the TypeCover though, it's in the main device.
Oops, yes, sorry. I have been traumatised by the type cover apparently
:)
Benjamin
quoted
+ .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK},
{ HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB,
USB_VENDOR_ID_STM_0,
USB_DEVICE_ID_STM_HID_SENSOR),
.driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK},