On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:42:41PM +0200, Marcin Niestroj wrote:
On 03.09.2016 19:53, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:35:26PM +0200, Marcin Niestroj wrote:
quoted
This driver enables us to use tps65217's power button as KEY_POWER on
am335x boards (directly connected button in chiliboard, accessible pin
via expansion header in beaglebone). This patch has been tested with
chiliboard.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Niestroj <redacted>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <redacted>
Was it produces by soing s/65218/65217 over
drivers/input/misc/tps65217-pwrbutton.c? I honestly can't see much
difference between the 2. Can they be probably be combined?
I didn't think of that earlier. Below is a patch that adds support for
tps65217 power button in tps65218-pwrbutton.c. Is this approach ok for
you? If yes, I will send new patch version with it.
Additionally I guess the file should be renamed to tps6521x-pwrbutton.c
and config option changed to CONFIG_INPUT_TPS6521X_PWRBUTTON?
We could but I do not think it is that important.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
b/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
index a39b626..19d2bb1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/tps65218-pwrbutton.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
/*
- * Texas Instruments' TPS65218 Power Button Input Driver
+ * Texas Instruments' TPS65217 and TPS65218 Power Button Input Driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
* Author: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
+ * Author: Marcin Niestroj <m.niestroj-z3quKL4iOrmQ6ZAhV5LmOA@public.gmane.org>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
@@ -18,31 +19,73 @@
#include <linux/input.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/tps65217.h>
#include <linux/mfd/tps65218.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-struct tps65218_pwrbutton {
+struct tps6521x_data {
+ unsigned int reg_status;
+ unsigned int pb_mask;
+ const char *name;
+};
+
+static const struct tps6521x_data tps65217_data = {
+ .reg_status = TPS65217_REG_STATUS,
+ .pb_mask = TPS65217_STATUS_PB,
+ .name = "tps65217_pwrbutton",
+};
+
+static const struct tps6521x_data tps65218_data = {
+ .reg_status = TPS65218_REG_STATUS,
+ .pb_mask = TPS65218_STATUS_PB_STATE,
+ .name = "tps65218_pwrbutton",
+};
+
+struct tps6521x_pwrbutton {
struct device *dev;
- struct tps65218 *tps;
+ void *tps;
struct input_dev *idev;
+ const struct tps6521x_data *data;
+ char phys[32];
};
-static irqreturn_t tps65218_pwr_irq(int irq, void *_pwr)
+static const struct of_device_id of_tps6521x_pwr_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ti,tps65217-pwrbutton", .data = &tps65217_data },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tps65218-pwrbutton", .data = &tps65218_data },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_tps6521x_pwr_match);
+
+static int tps6521x_reg_read(struct tps6521x_pwrbutton *pwr,unsigned int reg,
+ unsigned int *val)
{
- struct tps65218_pwrbutton *pwr = _pwr;
+ if (pwr->data == &tps65217_data)
+ return tps65217_reg_read((struct tps65217 *) pwr->tps,
+ reg, val);
+ else if (pwr->data == &tps65218_data)
+ return tps65218_reg_read((struct tps65218 *) pwr->tps,
+ reg, val);
This is step in right direction, but not quite there yet. You could add
the reg_read pointer to your tps6521x_data and avoid doing if/else/case,
or, maybe better yet, have registers accessible via regmap.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html