Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe()
From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-03 08:02:31
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
quoted
A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (2): Return directly after a failed kzalloc() Remove two OOM messages drivers/input/serio/at32psif.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)What possible rationale is there for including this "references" header? 566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net
Do any more software developers dare to reconsider source code also around a jump label like "out"?
This message id is for your message: "Source code review around jump label usage" sent December 11, 2015!
Can such an association with a bit of background information be occasionally useful for clarification of corresponding implementation details? Regards, Markus