Re: [PATCH] uinput: Fix module crash on driver exit with force feedback effects still loaded
flat view
From: Manuel Reimer <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-05 13:01:24
On 05/22/2016 08:22 PM, Manuel Reimer wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hello, I had a deeper look into the uinput kernel module crash problem, which happens when a game loads effects and the driver exits while the game is still running. The actual problem is, that "input_unregister_device", which is called in "uinput_destroy_device", seems to include some "cleanup routine" which includes erasing loaded force feedback effects. This cleanup routine causes the "uinput_dev_erase_effect" routine to be called, which will wait for the, already exited, daemon to answer this request. The existing code contains a device state test, but this test is placed wrong. My patch moves the device state test, which was in "uinput_request_send", to the "uinput_request_submit" function. This way the erase requests, triggered by "input_unregister_device", are rejected immediately, so they no longer cause any trouble. Should I have added a one-line comment above the device state test, mentioning the cleanup routine in "input_unregister_device"? Signed-off-by: Manuel Reimer <redacted>--- a/drivers/input/misc/uinput.c 2016-05-13 16:06:31.919351656 +0200 +++ b/drivers/input/misc/uinput.c 2016-05-22 19:33:30.814403482 +0200@@ -117,11 +117,6 @@ static int uinput_request_send(struct ui if (retval) return retval; - if (udev->state != UIST_CREATED) { - retval = -ENODEV; - goto out; - } - init_completion(&request->done); /*@@ -130,7 +125,6 @@ static int uinput_request_send(struct ui */ uinput_dev_event(udev->dev, EV_UINPUT, request->code, request->id); - out: mutex_unlock(&udev->mutex); return retval; }@@ -140,6 +134,9 @@ static int uinput_request_submit(struct { int error; + if (udev->state != UIST_CREATED) + return -ENODEV; + error = uinput_request_reserve_slot(udev, request); if (error) return error; --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello, did I use the correct list of recipients? This is my first try to fix something in kernel code, so it would really help me to get some suggestions about the right way to get something reviewed. Thanks in advance Manuel