On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:16:13PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:26PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

quoted

pwm->period field is not supposed to be changed by PWM users. The only
ones authorized to change it are the PWM core and PWM drivers.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

Applied?

You didn't specifically Ack this one, but I presumed that since the
change is essentially the same as for pwm-backlight, and this is another
prerequisite for the remainder of the series it should go in through the
PWM tree as well.

If you're taking Backlight patches through a !Backlight tree, you're
going to have to send out a pull-request.  There are no conflicts
currently, so I won't use it right away, but I need it in my arsenal
if they do occur.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx