Thread (105 messages) 105 messages, 10 authors, 2016-04-14

Re: [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept

From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-31 07:57:57
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-fbdev, linux-leds, linux-pwm, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:10 -0700
Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote:
quoted
@@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity {
 	PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments
+ * @period: reference period
+ * @polarity: reference polarity
+ *
+ * This structure describe board-dependent arguments attached to a PWM
s/describe/describes/
quoted
+ * device. Those arguments are usually retrieved from the PWM lookup table or
+ * DT definition.
+ * This should not be confused with the PWM state: PWM args not representing
s/not representing/don't represent/ ?
Yes, I meant "are not representing", but "don't represent" is fine.
quoted
+ * the current PWM state, but the configuration the PWM user plan to use
s/plan/plans/
quoted
+ * on this PWM device.
+ */
+struct pwm_args {
+	unsigned int period;
+	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
+};
+


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help