On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:20:53AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Duson,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 02:05:02AM +0800, cheng wei Lin wrote:
quoted
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for late to reply you and thanks for your command
Yes, I also agree, it looks great than my original code.
Thank you for confirming.
quoted
So, should I modify this and upstream v3 patch for you?
No, that is fine, I'll fix it up on my end.
Hmm, I am also looking at elan_get_x_resolution() and in case of SMB
we'll never get negative result since we are doing
"elan_convert_res(val[1] & 0x0F)". Was it intended as such, or do we
need to extend sign here via
(((char)(val[1] & 0x0F)) << 4) >> 4;
Thanks.
--
Dmitry