On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:20:53AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

Hi Duson,

On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 02:05:02AM +0800, cheng wei Lin wrote:

quoted

Hi Dmitry,

Sorry for late to reply you and thanks for your command

Yes, I also agree, it looks great than my original code.

Thank you for confirming.

quoted

So, should I modify this and upstream v3 patch for you?

No, that is fine, I'll fix it up on my end.

Hmm, I am also looking at elan_get_x_resolution() and in case of SMB
we'll never get negative result since we are doing
"elan_convert_res(val[1] & 0x0F)". Was it intended as such, or do we
need to extend sign here via

	(((char)(val[1] & 0x0F)) << 4) >> 4;

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry