Re: [PATCH 2/2 ] Surface Pro 2 HID sensor, wacom, keyboard/multitouch composite device
From: Derya <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-07 17:57:37
Am 07.03.2014 18:01, schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Derya [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Enumeration quirks for Surface Pro 2 sensor-hub Signed-off-by: Derya <redacted> --- drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 9c22e14..16f4bb8 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c@@ -668,6 +668,15 @@ static const struct hid_device_id sensor_hub_devices[]= { { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_STM_0, USB_DEVICE_ID_STM_HID_SENSOR), .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TOUCH_COVER_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_SURFACE_PRO_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK},this seems to be pretty heavy to have all three product id in the sensor hub. Is it mandatory?
We can post prune this until I have the time to have a closer look into the sensor stuff. The problem is the product id changes with the covers. We can use HID_ANY_ID instead of the product id, but that will apply to other MS devices, too. There are more MS Covers out there, I don't know how the others behave and I don't know, if the Surface Pro 1 needs it also.
Cheers, Benjaminquoted
{ HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, HID_ANY_ID, HID_ANY_ID) }, { } -- 1.8.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html