Re: [PATCH 2/2 ] Surface Pro 2 HID sensor, wacom, keyboard/multitouch composite device
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-07 17:01:46
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Derya [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Enumeration quirks for Surface Pro 2 sensor-hub Signed-off-by: Derya <redacted> --- drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 9c22e14..16f4bb8 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c@@ -668,6 +668,15 @@ static const struct hid_device_id sensor_hub_devices[]= { { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_STM_0, USB_DEVICE_ID_STM_HID_SENSOR), .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TOUCH_COVER_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK}, + { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, + USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_SURFACE_PRO_2), + .driver_data = HID_SENSOR_HUB_ENUM_QUIRK},
this seems to be pretty heavy to have all three product id in the sensor hub. Is it mandatory? Cheers, Benjamin
{ HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, HID_ANY_ID,
HID_ANY_ID) },
{ }
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html