On 20 November 2012 14:17, Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] wrote:

No, not really, it just does not work well with devm_* patches that got
applied: on removal you unprepare clock as the very first operation and
then devm_* does the rest which is wrong order.

Nice. I don't expect the order would do anything wrong, as we aren't
touching any registers between unpreparing clock and devm_ undo stuff.

I am looking at adding dem_* for clocks.

You mean, adding devm_clk_prepare, devm_clk_enable, devm_clk_prepare_enable ?