Re: [PATCH v1] i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation

On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

It seems that hid transport layers should go in drivers/hid.
However, I don't like mixing the transport layer and the final
drivers. Maybe this is the time to rework a little bit the tree.
To minimize the moves, we could introduce:
drivers/hid/busses/usb
drivers/hid/busses/i2c
drivers/hid/busses/bluetooth

Something like that, I would personally like. But I am not going to 
forcefully take it over without bluetooth guys agreeing on that as well.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs