Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 4 authors, 2012-04-08

Re: [PATCH 1/1] HID: add have_special_driver hid module parameter

From: Henrik Rydberg <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-03 17:10:08

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:01:37AM -0700, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
It probably should, yes. One of the reasons supporting this is that during 
USB reset (for example), the descriptors are reread from the device, which 
has a potential to cause a mismatch if a full rebind cycle is not 
performed. (I have a patch in my queue that tries to fix this, but moving 
the fixups to ll drivers is still something I will be considering).
Sounds good, it will also pave the way for the modalias patches.
A proper and clean implementation will have to be thought about though.

I specifically want to avoid situation when we'll be heading towards 
"let's put all quirk handling into one driver under giant VID/PID-based 
switch", as getting rid of that was the very original pulse to have HID 
bus introduced.
Absolutely. Less in-kernel lookups, less complex switches and more modularity.

Henrik
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help