On 10/29/2011 12:53 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Arend van Spriel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 10/29/2011 08:24 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:58:15AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c
index 2596321..36a28b8 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c
@@ -163,14 +163,15 @@ static int roccat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
device = devices[minor];
- mutex_lock(&device->readers_lock);
-
if (!device) {
pr_emerg("roccat device with minor %d doesn't exist\n", minor);
- error = -ENODEV;
- goto exit_err;
+ kfree(reader);
+ mutex_lock(&devices_lock);
Typo. mutex_unlock() instead of mutex_lock().
This is no typo, but simply wrong. Remove the mutex_lock() as we are
leaving the function here in error flow.
No, this one is definitely needed. Its devices_lock, not
device->readers_lock! And devices_lock is locked before so we need to
unlock it if we return in this branch.
You are right. I missed that. As usual Dan's eye is sharper ;-)
Gr. AvS