Thread (41 messages) flat view 41 messages, 6 authors, 2011-07-05

Re: [PATCH v6 08/18] mfd: twl6040: Add initial support

From: Samuel Ortiz <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-04 11:48:22
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-omap, lkml

Hi Peter,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:39:06PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
+int twl6040_is_powered(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
+{
+	return twl6040->power_count;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(twl6040_is_powered);
Do we really need to export this one ?
+static inline int twl6040_get_rev(struct twl6040 *twl6040)
+{
+	return twl6040->rev;
+}
+
+static inline int twl6040_request_irq(struct twl6040 *twl6040, int irq,
+				      irq_handler_t handler,
+				      unsigned long irqflags,
+				      const char *name,
+				      void *data)
+{
+	if (!twl6040->irq_base)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return request_threaded_irq(twl6040->irq_base + irq, NULL, handler,
+				    irqflags, name, data);
+}
+
+static inline void twl6040_free_irq(struct twl6040 *twl6040, int irq,
+				    void *data)
+{
+	if (!twl6040->irq_base)
+		return;
+
+	free_irq(twl6040->irq_base + irq, data);
+}
I don't see the value of those 3 inline functions. Removing them would make
the code actually more understandable (especially for the 2nd one).

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help