Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument form handle_sysrq() | linux-input

[PATCH 0/3] SysRq: do not pass tty argument around · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2010-08-04
[PATCH 2/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument form handle_sysrq() · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument form handle_sysrq() · Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> · 2010-08-04
[PATCH 3/3] USB: drop tty argument from usb_serial_handle_sysrq_char() · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 3/3] USB: drop tty argument from usb_serial_handle_sysrq_char() · Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> · 2010-08-04
[PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2010-08-05
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> · 2010-08-05
Re: [PATCH 0/3] SysRq: do not pass tty argument around · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2010-08-04
Re: [PATCH 0/3] SysRq: do not pass tty argument around · Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> · 2010-08-04

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument form handle_sysrq()

From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date: 2010-08-04 11:25:40
Also in: lkml

On 08/04/2010 02:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

Sysrq operations do not accept tty argument anymore so no need to pass
it to us.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <redacted>

Looks fine to me.  The kernel debugger was passing NULL anyway because
A) it was not going to be easy to figure out the tty at the time, and B)
the sysrq was not using the tty at the lowest level.

Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help