Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2010-08-05

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Input: sysrq - drop tty argument from sysrq ops handlers

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-04 08:56:41
Also in: lkml

I have a patch to drop the lock in serial_core.h, I'll post that
tomorrow hopefully, just checking if there's any objection there ? The
Fundamentally - no. However the impact it has on a lot of the drivers
will be significant and you'll be submitting a huge patch pile to fix up
all the locking assumptions (for one it means port->tty might change
across any call that ends up in sysrq)
serial drivers might need to be audited a bit to make sure they cope
with the lock being dropped and re-acquired around the sysrq call.
Architecturally I think it would make more sense to add a new sysrq
helper which merely sets a flag, and check that flag at the end of the IRQ
when dropping the lock anyway.

Otherwise it'll be a huge amount of work to even build test all those
consoles.

Alan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help