Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2009-02-28 00:01:42
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:32:04 -0800 Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
Why does this function:
static irqreturn_t powerbutton_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
int err;
u8 value;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
/* WORKAROUND for lockdep forcing IRQF_DISABLED on us, which
* we don't want and can't tolerate. Although it might be
* friendlier not to borrow this thread context...
*/
local_irq_enable();
#endif
err = twl4030_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER, &value,
STS_HW_CONDITIONS);
if (!err) {
input_report_key(powerbutton_dev, KEY_POWER,
value & PWR_PWRON_IRQ);
} else {
dev_err(dbg_dev, "twl4030: i2c error %d while reading TWL4030"
" PM_MASTER STS_HW_CONDITIONS register\n", err);
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
Which is connected up via this statement:
err = request_irq(irq, powerbutton_irq,
IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
"twl4030-pwrbutton", NULL);
reenable local interrupts?ah, OK, twl4030_i2c_read_u8() does i2c I/O. Can't do that. If some random process currently holds mutex_lock(&twl->xfer_lock) and an interrupt occurs then this interrupt handler will try to acquire mutex_lock(&twl->xfer_lock). Deadlock.