Re: [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2008-06-17 14:39:16
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2008-06-25 · [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support · Ville Syrjala <hidden>
- 2008-06-17 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
- 2008-06-17 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
- 2008-06-17 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support · Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
- 2008-06-17 · Re: [PATCH 2/2] ati_remote2: Add autosuspend support · Dmitry Torokhov <hidden>
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Input core only protects open() and close(); connect() and disconnect() belong to respective bus's implementation the device is sitting on and input core has no authority over it.
What about open vs. unregister? The input core must have some protection for those two. Alan Stern