Re: [patch 1/3] m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2007-07-21 08:28:25
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 7/20/07, Adrian Bunk [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:47:36PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
On 7/20/07, Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible drivers/char/keyboard.c: In function 'kbd_keycode': drivers/char/keyboard.c:1142: error: implicit declaration of function 'mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons' The forward declaration of mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() is not visible on m68k because it's hidden in the middle of a big #ifdef block. Move it to <linux/hid.h>, correct the type of the second parameter, and include <linux/hid.h> where needed.linux/hid.h contains definitions needed for drivers speaking HID protocol, I don't think we want to put quirks for legacy keyboard driver there. I'd just move the #ifdef within drivers/char/keyboard.c for now. ...If you only move it you will keep the bug of the wrong second parameter. But if you move it to any header file gcc is able to figure out such errors itself instead of them being nasty runtime errors. Such prototypes in C files are really bad since (like in this case) they prevent the finding of bugs. It doesn't matter which header file you put the prototype into (it can even be a new one), but it belongs into a header file.I am OK with adding a new header file. I was just saying that placing that declaration in linux/hid.h makes about the same sense as putting it into linux/scsi.h
At first I just wanted to move it. Then I thought about the angry
comments I would get about not moving it to a header file ;-)
<linux/hid.h> looked like the best candidate. <linux/kbd_kern.h> is
another option.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds