Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2007-07-24

Re: [patch 1/3] m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible

From: Adrian Bunk <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-20 18:35:53
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:47:36PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Geert,

On 7/20/07, Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

m68k/mac: Make mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() declaration visible

drivers/char/keyboard.c: In function 'kbd_keycode':
drivers/char/keyboard.c:1142: error: implicit declaration of function 
'mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons'

The forward declaration of mac_hid_mouse_emulate_buttons() is not visible 
on
m68k because it's hidden in the middle of a big #ifdef block.

Move it to <linux/hid.h>, correct the type of the second parameter, and
include <linux/hid.h> where needed.
linux/hid.h contains definitions needed for drivers speaking HID
protocol, I don't think we want to put quirks for legacy keyboard
driver there. I'd just move the #ifdef within drivers/char/keyboard.c
for now.
...
If you only move it you will keep the bug of the wrong second parameter.

But if you move it to any header file gcc is able to figure out such 
errors itself instead of them being nasty runtime errors.

Such prototypes in C files are really bad since (like in this case) they 
prevent the finding of bugs. It doesn't matter which header file you put 
the prototype into (it can even be a new one), but it belongs into a 
header file.
Dmitry
cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help