Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 13 authors, 2017-05-08

Re: Race to power off harming SATA SSDs

From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-08 18:56:20
Also in: linux-scsi, lkml

On Mon 2017-05-08 13:43:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted
What I was trying to point out was that storage people try to treat
SSDs as HDDs... and SSDs are very different. Harddrives mostly survive
powerfails (with emergency parking), while it is very, very difficult
to make SSD survive random powerfail, and we have to make sure we
always powerdown SSDs "cleanly".
We do.

The issue raised is that some SSDs still increment the unexpected
power loss count even after clean shutdown sequence and that the
kernel should wait for some secs before powering off.

We can do that for select devices but I want something more than "this
SMART counter is getting incremented" before doing that.
Well... the SMART counter tells us that the device was not shut down
correctly. Do we have reason to believe that it is _not_ telling us
truth? It is more than one device.

SSDs die when you power them without warning:
http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html

What kind of data would you like to see? "I have been using linux and
my SSD died"? We have had such reports. "I have killed 10 SSDs in a
week then I added one second delay, and this SSD survived 6 months"?


									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help