Re: Race to power off harming SATA SSDs
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-05-08 15:40:21
Also in:
linux-scsi, lkml
Attachments
- smime.p7s [application/x-pkcs7-signature] 4938 bytes
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: 2017-05-08 15:40:21
Also in:
linux-scsi, lkml
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 13:50 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2017 11:13:10 +0100 David Woodhouse [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 11:09 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:quoted
You're forgetting that the SSD itself (this thread is about SSDs) also has a major software component which is doing housekeeping all the time, so even if the main CPU gets reset the SSD's controller may still happily be erasing blocks.We're not really talking about SSDs at all any more; we're talking about real flash with real maintainable software.It's probably a good sign that this new discussion should take place in a different thread :-).
Well, maybe. But it was a silly thread in the first place. SATA SSDs aren't *expected* to be reliable.