Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 9 authors, 2012-09-28

Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] scsi: sr: support runtime pm

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-24 12:55:31
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-scsi

On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
quoted
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it.
OK, so how is ODD related to the sr driver?
As Alan has explained, ODD(optical disk drive) is driven by scsi
sr driver.
OK, but what about writing "ODD (Optical Disk Drive)" in the changelog?

People reading git logs may not know all of the hardware acronyms and the
"0" message doesn't go into the git log. :-)
quoted
quoted
quoted
The only exception is, if we just find that a new medium is
inserted, we wait for the next events checking to idle it.
What exactly do you mean by "to idle it"?
I mean to put its usage count so that its idle callback will kick in.
So I'd just write that directly in the changelog.
quoted
quoted
Does this patch have any functional effect without the following patches?
Yes, this one alone takes care of ODD's runtime pm
I suppose you mean the runtime PM status and usage counter?  I.e. the "software
state"?
Yes.
quoted
quoted
while the following
patches take care of removing its power after it's runtime suspended.
But it doesn't have any real benefit without the following patches.
Please put that information into the changelog too.
As Alan explained, I think I would say:
Though currently it doesn't have any benefit, it allows its parent
devices enter runtime suspend state which may save some power.
Well, please say that in the changelog, then. :-)
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Based on ideas of Alan Stern and Oliver Neukum.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <redacted>
---
 drivers/scsi/sr.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr.c b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
index 5fc97d2..7a8222f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 #include <scsi/scsi.h>
@@ -146,8 +147,12 @@ static inline struct scsi_cd *scsi_cd_get(struct gendisk *disk)
 	kref_get(&cd->kref);
 	if (scsi_device_get(cd->device))
 		goto out_put;
+	if (scsi_autopm_get_device(cd->device))
+		goto out_pm;
 	goto out;
Why don't you do
quoted
+	if (!scsi_autopm_get_device(cd->device))
+		goto out;
without the new label?
I was just stupidly following the pattern.
Thanks and I'll change this.
quoted
quoted
 
+ out_pm:
+	scsi_device_put(cd->device);
  out_put:
 	kref_put(&cd->kref, sr_kref_release);
 	cd = NULL;
@@ -163,6 +168,7 @@ static void scsi_cd_put(struct scsi_cd *cd)
 	mutex_lock(&sr_ref_mutex);
 	kref_put(&cd->kref, sr_kref_release);
 	scsi_device_put(sdev);
+	scsi_autopm_put_device(sdev);
 	mutex_unlock(&sr_ref_mutex);
 }
 
@@ -211,7 +217,7 @@ static unsigned int sr_check_events(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi,
 				    unsigned int clearing, int slot)
 {
 	struct scsi_cd *cd = cdi->handle;
-	bool last_present;
+	bool last_present = cd->media_present;
 	struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
 	unsigned int events;
 	int ret;
@@ -220,6 +226,8 @@ static unsigned int sr_check_events(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi,
 	if (CDSL_CURRENT != slot)
 		return 0;
 
+	scsi_autopm_get_device(cd->device);
+
 	events = sr_get_events(cd->device);
 	cd->get_event_changed |= events & DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
 
@@ -246,10 +254,9 @@ static unsigned int sr_check_events(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi,
 	}
 
 	if (!(clearing & DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE))
-		return events;
+		goto out;
 do_tur:
 	/* let's see whether the media is there with TUR */
-	last_present = cd->media_present;
 	ret = scsi_test_unit_ready(cd->device, SR_TIMEOUT, MAX_RETRIES, &sshdr);
 
 	/*
@@ -270,7 +277,7 @@ do_tur:
 	}
 
 	if (cd->ignore_get_event)
-		return events;
+		goto out;
 
 	/* check whether GET_EVENT is reporting spurious MEDIA_CHANGE */
 	if (!cd->tur_changed) {
@@ -287,6 +294,12 @@ do_tur:
 	cd->tur_changed = false;
 	cd->get_event_changed = false;
 
+out:
+	if (cd->media_present && !last_present)
+		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&cd->device->sdev_gendev);
+	else
+		scsi_autopm_put_device(cd->device);
+
This thing is asking for a comment.

It looks like you're kind of avoiding to call _idle() for the device, but why?
What might go wrong if pm_runtime_put() is used instead of the whole conditional,
among other things?
The above code means, if we found that a disc is just inserted(reflected
by cd->media_present is true and last_present is false), we do not want
to put the device into suspend state immediately until next poll. In the
interval, some programs may decide to use this device by opening it.

Nothing will go wrong, but it can possibly avoid a runtime status change.
OK, so suppose the condition is true and we do the _noidle() put.  Who's
going to suspend the device in that case if no one actually uses the device?
Next time when the check_events poll runs, it will find that:
1 Either the disc is still there, then both last_present and
  media_present would be true, we will do the put to idle it;
2 Or the disc is ejected, we will do the put to idle it.
In that case I would do:

pm_runtime_put_noidle(&cd->device->sdev_gendev);
if (cd->media_present && !last_present)
    pm_runtime_suspend(&cd->device->sdev_gendev);

And I'd add a comment about the next poll.

This appears somewhat racy, though, because in theory a media may be inserted
while we are removing power from the device.  Isn't that a problem?
The poll runs periodically, until the device is powered off(reflected by
the powered_off flag), in which case, the poll will simply return
0 without touching this device.
Is it useful to poll the device after it has been suspended, but not powered
off?
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
 	return events;
 }
 
@@ -715,9 +728,14 @@ static int sr_probe(struct device *dev)
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, cd);
 	disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_REMOVABLE;
 	add_disk(disk);
+	disk_events_set_poll_msecs(disk, 5000);
Why do you need this and why is the poll interval universally suitable?
For a system with udev, the block module parameter events_dfl_poll_msecs
will be set to 2s. If disk's events_poll_msecs is not set, that will be
used. So the disk will be polled every 2s, that means it will be runtime
suspended/resumed every 2s if there is no user. I set it to 5s so that
the device can stay in runtime suspended state longer.

And the sysfs interface is still there, if udev thinks a device needs
special setting, it will do that and I'll not overwrite that setting.
I'm not quite convinced this is the right approach here.

So if you set it to 5 s this way, the user space will have no idea that
the polling happens less often than it thinks, or am I misunderstanding
what you said above?
That's correct.
AFAIK, user space does not care how often the device is polled, it
cares only one thing: when there is a media change event, please let me
know(through uevent).
So that's why we do the polling, right?
I agree that we can't make user wait for too long before seeing
something happen(auto play, etc.) after he inserted a disc, and 5
seconds doesn't seem too long to me.
quoted
Moreover, what about changing the code so that the polling doesn't
actually resume the device?
Since the device is going to do IO(executing a scsi command), I think I
should resume the device.

But there is a case for ZPODD, when the ODD is powered off(reflected by
the powered_off flag), the events checking will simply return without
resuming the device.
Yes, I understand that.  My question is whether or not we still need to poll
if the device hasn't been powered off, although it has been suspended.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
 
 	sdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, sdev,
 		    "Attached scsi CD-ROM %s\n", cd->cdi.name);
+
+	/* enable runtime pm */
Not really.  What it does is to enable the device to be suspended.
OK, will change this.
quoted
quoted
+	scsi_autopm_put_device(cd->device);
+
 	return 0;
 
 fail_put:
@@ -965,6 +983,9 @@ static int sr_remove(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct scsi_cd *cd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
+	/* disable runtime pm */
And that prevents the device from being suspended (which means that it's
going to be resumed at this point in case it was suspended before).
Yes, that's what I want.
We are removing its driver and I think we should undo what we have done
to it.
Yes, I agree.  Only the comment wording can better reflect what really
happens here (runtime PM is not disabled, in particular).
OK, looks like you are saying by disable, disable_depth is the subject
while I'm playing with usage_count. I'll pay attention to these words,
thanks for the remind.
Please do.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help