Re: [patch 2/4] Expose Power Management Policy option to users
From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-01 03:26:13
Also in:
linux-scsi, lkml
From: Tejun Heo <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-01 03:26:13
Also in:
linux-scsi, lkml
Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
quoted
I don't think the interface you're suggesting is a good one. Do you?I think if it's applicable to SCSI at all it is fine. If it is not, then I think we need to make do with the interface we are given. I do not think we should hold up a feature for libata sysfs integration.
Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here and leave the decision to James and Jeff.
quoted
quoted
I can assert that I think ALPM is a good idea, because I've never had a report of it causing problems. Windows has been using this feature for a very long time - and you have to admit that they have a pretty large market share. Nobody is complaining about ALPM increasing device malfunction, so unless you have proof it seems insane to nak due to this.Is ALPM enabled by default? How do they deal with the performance degradation?I believe so, but I'm obviously not privvy to their implementation details.
It would be *really* great if we can find more about how they do it. How and when it's enabled and on which systems. Is it possible to find this out? -- tejun