Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 4 authors, 2005-02-10

Re: [rfc][patch] ide: fix unneeded LBA48 taskfile registers access

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: 2005-02-10 00:24:31
Also in: lkml

Hello Tejun,

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:01:58 +0900, Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:
  Hello, Bartlomiej.  Happy new lunar year.

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
quoted
I would prefer to not teach do_rw_taskfile() about ->tf_{in,out}_flags
(and convert all users to use helpers) - it is much simpler this way,

->flags field in ide_task_t is needed anyway (32-bit I/O flag).
  New lunar year day is one of the biggest holidays here, so I haven't
got time to work for a few days.  As it's over now, I began to work on
ide drivers again.  I applied your task->flags patch and am moving my
patches over it.

  One problem is that, with ATA_TFLAG_LBA48, whether to use HOB
registers or not cannot be determined separately for writing and
reading.  So, when initializing flush tasks, if WIN_FLUSH_CACHE_EXT is
used, we need to turn on ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 to read error location
properly, and we end up unnecessarily writing HOB registers.
Yep, good catch.
  I think we can...

  1. Just leave it as it is.  It's not that big a deal.
  2. Use another flag(s) to control LBA48 reading/writing separately.
  3. do my proposal. :-)

  I'm currently sticking to #1.  Please let me know what you think.
agreed, #1 is a good choice, it is not that important to make things
more complicated

Thanks,
Bartlomiej
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help